EU tobacco review: striking the right balance between economy, health and jobs
Employing almost 1.5 million people in the EU, the tobacco sector promotes rural and economic development and is one of the few major export sectors to still maintain a positive balance, both at the European level and in many member states. Following a heated debate at its 10-11 July plenary session, the European Economic and Social Committee adopted an opinion on the review of the tobacco directive proposed by the European Commission.
The EESC today argued that the changes proposed by the Commission would have serious consequences for jobs, the economy and tax revenues, thereby breaching other fundamental EU objectives such as full employment and restored growth. However, the European Economic and Social Committee is also fully aware of the risks that tobacco poses to public health. It is crucial that health takes priority over all economic considerations, though scepticism remains on how effectively the European Commission’s proposed measures help the gradual process of quitting.
The Committee stresses the importance of school-based educational and counselling strategies at EU level to ensure that every child or young person is informed of the realities of smoking and its harmful effects. It is strongly in favour of promoting public education and awareness-raising campaigns concerning the serious health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.
“Disease prevention must not be neglected. However, as a player of the internal market, tobacco also involves jobs and the industry”, stated José Isaías Rodríguez García-Caro, rapporteur of the EESC opinion on “Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products. “Health and economic considerations must both be considered.”
Tobacco production contributes to rural employment. The current tobacco leaf harvest in the EU amounts to 250,000 tonnes of tobacco per year and provides employment to 400, 000 people. The EESC acknowledges the threat that may be caused to employment in agricultural areas where no other alternatives have been developed and where CAP subsidies are no longer available. The cohesion and structural funds, regional funds and funds for research and innovation should be used effectively to minimise these labour market risks and implement training schemes for workers, together with scientific, technical and innovation support for enterprises and farms.